Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlanAJ
Some defective requirements can be fixed almost as cheaply at the end of development. And I'm not just referring to "cosmetic" defects. Take, for example, legal caveats or wordings prescribed by statute. If we know early on that these are required but not exactly what is required, we can generally proceed with development at little additional risk while the precise text is hammered out by an army of lawyers, copywriters, focus groups and officials. Often all we really need to do is plan accordingly.
|
I think this is actually a really great point. In an SRS, how have you typically handled or called our requirements that you know are incomplete/wrong at the time of writing?