Invitation to join "Requirements Engineering" Yahoo Group

[kasim_sen]

Dear

We invite you to join "Requirements Engineering" Yahoo Group to discuss the subjects for RE.

SEI says:
“Done well, requirements engineering presents an opportunity to reduce costs and increase the quality of software systems. Done poorly, it could lead to a software project failure.”


Our purpose is to provide environment for sharing experience in the scope of Software Requirements Engineering.

Subjects are:
1-)Requirements Eng. Process
2-)Importance of Requirements and Elicitation Techniques
3-)Requirements Analysis Patterns
4-)Types and Attributes of Requirements
5-)Requirements Managements
6-)Requirements in the scope of CMMI
7-)Developing the requirements

To join us:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Requirements-Engineering/

Post message: Requirements-Engineering@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: Requirements-Engineering-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: Requirements-Engineering-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


We apologize to you for disturbing with this invitation message.


Best Regards,

Moderator

[MGoyal]

Ok, we need somebody to join the Yahoo Group and let them know about the great requirements discussions going on over here! :)

ok, i'll volunteer myself.

[kasim_sen]

Hi

Today, "Requirements Engineering" Yahoo Group has 900+ members.
In addition, we have approximately 60 messages within discussion topics for each month.

Join now:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Requirements-Engineering/

Start your discussion:
Requirements-Engineering@yahoogroups.com

Thanks, best regards.

[kasim_sen]

To remind.

Regards.
Kasim SEN

[kenjmason]

The RQNG http://www.requirementsnetwork.com/ is also a great resource.

[gescober]

The Yahoo group is perhaps the most technical/academic of the requirements forums I read.

RQNQ isn't bad, but their forum software drove me nuts, so I don't visit very often anymore. The way they display threads and do nesting wasn't very readable.

[tansohn]

The Yahoo group is perhaps the most technical/academic of the requirements forums I read.

RQNQ isn't bad, but their forum software drove me nuts, so I don't visit very often anymore. The way they display threads and do nesting wasn't very readable.

I agree with you

[jbeatty]

Me too
I like the yahoo group, but I find it requires some serious quiet time to follow the threads (sometimes they spin a tad out of control!). But some good contributors/content over there.

[tpatterson]

Looks like it has some good content, but no matter how hard I try, I can't hang with Yahoo groups. The signal to noise ratio is just too low. :(

[gescober]

Things improved for me on the Yahoo group when I went to getting the digest delivered instead of individual e-mails. Even then, the format and delivery method leave something to be desired.

Agree about the contributors - Cockburn and Capers are pretty important voices in the community. I've seen Wiegers contributing there. (as well as here) RQNQ has Ambler contributing quite a bit, but usually to take potshots at the analyst role in context of agile.

[MAlexander]

RQNQ has Ambler contributing quite a bit, but usually to take potshots at the analyst role in context of agile.

I thought Ambler only took potshots at the actual Analysts, not the entire role! Looks like he's started to branch out! :D